The same instrument, from either side of the table.
For counsel.
If you are responding to a complaint, a civil investigative demand, or a regulator's inquiry, an engagement can be scoped with your counsel from the start, including what is produced, how work product is handled, and the timeline the matter requires. Start that conversation through the contact page and say counsel is involved.
You bought it. You did not build it.
If the conversational AI in your product is a vendor's, an Assessment can be commissioned by you and run on the system you are buying, as part of vendor risk review. Same instrument, same report, commissioned by the buyer rather than the builder.
The whole engagement, in one row
No surprises.
Scope is agreed in writing before anything starts. Nothing connects to your system until you have signed off on what is being scored. The record that comes back is yours.
How scope is set
Scope depends on how many scenarios, how much traffic and how specific the question is. We work that out with you up front and put it in writing before an engagement begins. No surprises and no lock-in.
If you are not sure which of the two you need, the Assessment answers it. It tells you where you stand, and whether a one-time reading is enough or the question is going to keep coming back.
Two situations worth naming
You approve the scope before anything runs.
For an Assessment or Audit, our scenario set runs against your system from our end, over a simple API. For Monitoring, your anonymized live traffic. Never your codebase, your system prompt, or your users' identities.
Every response passes the Safety Gate screen, then the eight-dimension standard, scored by Ikwe's patent-pending judging system: independent AI judges, calibrated against human scoring, that have to agree. Disagreement escalates for review, never averaged away.
Where you sit against the four score bands, with every failure traced to the turn it happened on and the transcript around it.
An Assessment or Audit returns a scored report. Monitoring returns a live-scoring dashboard, check-ins on a regular cadence, and a named person on your account.
Whichever one is yours, it starts the same way.
Thirty minutes. We will tell you where to start, scope it in writing, and send pricing. Nothing connects until you sign off, and the record that comes back is yours. If none of this is right for you yet, we will say so.
Usually it is the head of product, the general counsel, or whoever owns risk who brings us in. Bring whoever will have to answer the question, and whoever signs.
You do not have an answer on paper
Someone has started asking what your AI does in a hard conversation. An Assessment tells you where you stand, and where the record starts.
Something specific has been asked
A board, a carrier or a regulator has a named question. An Audit is looking back once, scoped to it, written up for whoever is asking.
You cannot predict the question yet
Your model changes and a reading from March does not describe what shipped in August. Monitoring is the same standard, run continuously.
A model that changes needs a reading that changes with it. A record built over time shows a trend rather than a single point.